Where Can I See First Man Near Me
To experience the impossible journey
'Kickoff Man' intrigued me from the become go. It was based on 1 of the most of import and fascinating true stories and achievements in that location's ever been, and a very interesting homo. It had talented actors such as Ryan Gosling and Claire Foy, both of whom take done a lot of fine piece of work. And it was directed by Damien Chazelle, responsible for 'Whiplash' and 'La La Land' which for me were both among the all-time of their respective years.
Seeing 'Starting time Man', there is a lot to adore and it was not a problem for me that it took a different approach and an anarchistic way of executing a biopic. Can run into why 'Offset Man' hasn't continued with others though, it is a polarising flick where ane can see both sides of like and dislike and role of me was a piddling disappointed. With so much going for information technology, one expects a great moving picture but 'First Man' for me was only adept and not equally good as 'Whiplash' and 'La La Land'. Ranking it among other 2022 films seen, information technology'south nowhere near amidst the worst it also falls short of being one of the best.
Starting with the not so skilful things, 'First Man' runs a little likewise long, something that would take been solved past trimming a few of the scenes that went on longer than they needed to. Which would accept tightened some of the pacing, some of the film drags.
At times structurally it'southward disjointed, with some of the back and forth not always clear while aspects could have been delved into farther. Practice take to concur as well sadly that the shakiness of the camera piece of work was excessive at times, did feel queasiness on occasions. The ending felt anti-climactic.
Even so, on the nigh part 'Get-go Man' is visually stunning. It's immaculately designed and there is a lot of atmosphere and elegance in the way it's shot, an constructive claustrophobia in the more tense scenes being evoked. Not everybody has liked the music, personally plant it very haunting and similar with 'Whiplash' and 'La La Country' Chazelle'south utilisation of it is masterly. Chazelle's unique directing style is all over the moving-picture show.
The script is intelligent and idea-provoking and while the storytelling was non perfect mostly it did engross me and boasts some thrillingly tense moments (like one of my favourite opening scenes of the year), a subtle intimacy and emotional power. The homo drama is affecting and the training and flight sequences tight and take a suitable tension and grandeur. The characters are non what one calls likeable simply at that place is a realism to them and 'Get-go Man' is very strongly acted. Ryan Gosling shows a remarkable ability of conveying a lot without having to say a lot in scenes while Claire Foy provides the moving picture'south emotional heft magnificently. There is a detachment in their chemistry only that worked considering the situation, coping with grief and loss does bulldoze a wedge and push button people away. The rest of the cast do well, with Corey Stoll surprisingly providing 1 of the more colourful performances.
Summing up, adept merely could have been better. Not a giant leap in moving picture-making, non a small pace either. 7/10 Bethany Cox
27 out of 41 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Somewhat routine
Warning: Spoilers
First Homo is a routine dramatisation of America'southward lunar landings, following in the footsteps of Neil Armstrong as he undergoes personal tragedy and grooming issues on his way to becoming 1 of the 20th century's most famous figures. It's a lengthy and overly worthy affair, bogged down in a sense of its own importance. Cast members including Ryan Gosling, Claire Foy and Ciaran Hinds are all fine and undecayed in their roles, just I found the management somewhat pedestrian, only getting interesting in some outer-space visuals that experience like they hark back to the likes of 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY. Information technology's non a bad moving-picture show, but I'd much rather watch the real thing - i.e. a documentary - instead.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dry
In 1961, Neil Armstrong (Ryan Gosling) is a test pilot for the X-15 with nerves of steel. He manages to save the landing after some difficulties. Others dismiss him every bit only an egghead engineer. He is severely private but he does break down over his daughter's death. Janet (Claire Foy) is his dutiful wife. He joins the Gemini programme run past old astronaut Deke Slayton (Kyle Chandler) which would lead him to exist the first man on the moon.
This is Damien Chazelle's commencement flick without music equally the subject. He is able to bring action to the space exploration. In that location are a couple of squeamish visceral close shaves. The Gemini uncontrolled spin is really thrilling. The spousal relationship is interesting with two compelling actors. The over-riding feeling is a dry unemotional narrative. Most of that is due to the tranquility reserve of Armstrong. He is non a man of emoting and the film has to piece of work within the constrains of his personality. The production is impeccable. The vibe doesn't accept the emotional highs and lows that are necessarily for a truly intense movie.
4 out of 7 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Slides Away Quicky
I just watched this on a plane. I was fairly impressed at offset but as I've thought about it a skillful deal and I realize it's non a nifty film. First of all, we are immediately made to believe that the death of Armstong's daughter has something to practise with the space plan. I agree, it shows a human being side of him, only to get in central to his desires and ambitions is pretty simplistic. That is forgivable, but what is lacking is a taut story that really grabs usa. This is the space race. Yep, I know that many Americans wanted the money to go elsewhere. At some point, nevertheless, all thos issues are tossed bated. This could have been really well done with some better writing. I as well had some problem with Gosling playing Neil Armstrong..
4 out of vii found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An epic event, a very mediocre movie
Warning: Spoilers
"First Man" is a new 2022 movie and this was considered ane of the big players this American awards season in fact. Until its release that is because the reception was not extremely positive hither. But get-go things first. The director here is Damien Chazelle, despite his historic period an Oscar winner already, and looking at the awards recognition for his previous 2 movies it is like shooting fish in a barrel to come across why and so many idea this one could exist a huge hit as well. He is not credited as a writer this fourth dimension, which may exist the film'southward biggest problem because as skillful or fifty-fifty great as Josh Vocalist was on Spotlight, here he is extremely underwhelming when it came to adapting Hansen'due south novel. The subject is of course based on real events, which the proper name Neil Armstrong should tell absolutely everybody, even people like myself who were born a long time after the moon landing. And looking at words from my mother, I found out how this was actually among the most defining moments that she remembers very well half a century later apparently. So it is really surprising why information technology took this long for a big moving picture to be fabricated around this spectacular field of study and looking at the success of the likes of Gravity and The Martian, it'southward probably no surprise it came out at present. But it is inferior I must say. In that location is absolutely nothing wrong with Chazelle's direction, only looking at how his previous 2 successful films are works of fiction, information technology may be better for him to render to said arroyo. Also here the more fictitious sequences are better than the historic ones, even if of course he did non write the script. With the fictitious parts, I am referring to all the matrimony scenes mostly. I am pretty sure at that place is very little real life reference to these with what was between Mr. and Mrs. Armstrong aside from the girl'southward death for instance which must have been based on actual events. The best moment is probably when Gosling's character tells his kids that he may non render or lets say what follows after when we encounter the kids leave the room. Even in this scene, Gosling feels incredibly bland and I idea he was a weak casting decision here to exist honest. Then over again, I am not a fan of him at all and I swear he has about always the same face expression during his films. I wonder why people are criticizing Kristen Stewart for that and not Gosling. Anyhow, of form Gosling was the lead in Chazelle'due south La La Land, and then I am not too surprised to see him here again. How much or if he resembles Armstrong physically, I cannot say.
As for the very final scene with the hands and the glass betwixt them, I am undecided. I think it was a scrap too long with Foy's reaction, but the very last shot was pretty good and the moving picture could accept ended on a weaker note for sure. Equally for Foy, she is enjoying quite a career these days with her role every bit Salander in a new film, here as Neil Armstrong's wife or in a recent psycho thriller a(due north alleged) stalking victim. And this does not fifty-fifty include her small screen trademark office where she won (surprisingly) big this yr over again as well over Lizzie Moss. But back to this movie we got here. As you run into from my rating, I really don't charge per unit it highly. This also has to exercise with my personal approach on the idea of higher faster further and the fact that I am completely d'accord with the African American guy who complained how they use and then much money for space exploration and lost so many lives of astronauts. Add to that that the concept of space exploration is so far in the by now that it may be a difficult time for releasing a picture like that. The epicness that by generations saw in this achievement is lost on today's people and sadly this film cannot rekindle the burn. Interesting references similar Gagarin being in infinite earlier the Americans felt rushed in and wasted. Same about the very personal story of the girl'due south death early on. It certain felt a fleck impuissant in that location unfortunately. The big counter plot to the space story here is the family conflict about Foy's graphic symbol's criticisms of Armstrong risking his life despite beingness a father of ii and the neighbor family going through the same fate cannot alone brand upward for information technology. Besides, the picture show did feel far too long in my stance. It had some lengths in the beginning half and information technology did not feel one-half as relevant as information technology should have with one dangerous space mission post-obit the next. Sure there is nothing wrong with the motion-picture show visually and technically, merely this alone is non enough. It lacks way too much in my stance in several other departments for me to recommend the movie. This is not Apollo xiii and Ryan Gosling sure isn't Tom Hanks, non even in a film that is non among the very best in terms of performances in my stance for the latter. So aye, skip this one. It'southward not worth spending nigh two.5 hours on.
viii out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
No lift off
If The Right Stuff was near the first American men in space. First Human is a kind of quasi sequel nearly the first human being on the moon.
Damien Chazelle follows up La La State with a breathtaking opening sequence of Neil Armstrong (Ryan Gosling) as test pilot. So far it looks like another stab at the Best Picture Oscar.
In that location are another amazing sequences including the bodily mission to the moon and the scenes on the moon. The scenes where Armstrong looks at the surface of the moon to me felt rather realistic.
As a drama it is listless, even po faced. Chazelle's film never blasts off, peradventure the script was at error for focussing too much on Armstrong who looks impassive when he should exist impassioned.
Claire Foy comes across improve as his wife with the limited material she is given. The role player playing Buzz Aldrin looks all wrong.
It is such an uneven film with bouts of boredom forth with jolts of some wonderful visuals.
4 out of 8 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tedious, responsible, and balanced just produces quite the emotional aspect besides
Starting time Man is not the film for air-punching relief at the end of tense scenes of danger which have been preceded by tender scenes making united states of america intendance about the people in those moments; this is not to say that on this basis alone that it is a amend film than those that practice these things, just it is certainly different. There is an emotional core to the pic simply generally it is deliberately distant, cold, and balanced. The Armstrong of the film is all these things, and the flick follows him in that way. There are no big moments to speak of - fifty-fifty the moon walk is reflective and silent.
This produces a film that engages by how consistent it is, and the feeling of accuracy and observation. It runs long just if y'all get the feel/pace early so information technology doesn't feel it. Instead information technology offers more character in Armstrong, as hard as information technology is at times to like him, it is engaging for how he is. The downside of this approach is that the film tin be ho-hum if you aren't going with it or if you lot wanted it to be more like Apollo 13. While at times I wanted information technology to accept at to the lowest degree some scenes like that, it worked well without them, and the impact of the opening scenes ripples through the final ones because of how restrained information technology all is.
Chazelle's direction gets this tone right, and produces a convincing operation from Gosling. It is an odd one because information technology seems and then characterless just yet there is a lot there. He is well supported past a host of recognizable but not too recognizable faces, but it is Claire Foy who gives the film its heart, and pulls off the difficult job of having the human being, emotional moments but however not making them feel like they are breaking out into a different film.
First Man is slow and deliberate, but it works for what it sets out to practise, and plays like a responsible, balanced, and even-handed bopic which manages to have more than of an emotional impact due to how little of information technology is worn on the sleeve or shouted over the orchestra.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
We need to fail downwards here, and so nosotros don't fail upwardly at that place.
Alert: Spoilers
This is a biopic of the first human being on the moon. Neil Armstrong was a quiet individual reclusive human who had a difficult time expressing his feelings. He had a number of brushes with decease and through a combination of skill and luck managed to survive. The flick also shows the protests and attempts to terminate the program. It spends time showing his wife and the difficulties she had with his quietness as well every bit his brushes with death. It was an era when y'all could smoke within a house without being looked upon equally a criminal.
The astronauts never drank Tang in the movie, nor is the motion picture a adept fit to lookout man while listening to "The Dark Side of the Moon." Sometimes our heroes put their pants on ane leg at a fourth dimension. His deist religious views did non come up in the film. Armstrong passed in 2012 with his ashes scattered at bounding main.
Don't await the film to exist a tribute.
Guide: 1 F-word. No sex activity or nudity.
14 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Information technology'll be an adventure." - Janet Armstrong to husband Neil Armstrong
Warning: Spoilers
I had stayed away from this film due to the pre-release controversy over the omission of the American flag planting on the moon. The hint of a political agenda in movies similar this are a downer for me, so information technology made me hesitant well-nigh watching the motion picture. Possibly the controversy was overblown somewhat, although that aspect of the moon landing was of import and if I had my mode it would have been included. The matter is, while yous're watching the landing unfold, it's non something you particularly miss, particularly if you weren't around back in 1969, and aren't aware of the details of that beginning moon landing. And there are scenes in which the American flag is prominent, along with a French woman, I believe, interviewed after the fact, that praises and thank you America for accomplishing such an historic mission. Then I appreciated that.
Historically, the moving picture appears to capture the real angst nearly American space flying relative to it's cost in money and lives, and the personal toll it took on members of the NASA family unit during numerous examination phases getting fix for Apollo 11. Without knowing about whatsoever of the personal details of men similar Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, Mike Collins, or Ed White, the story unfolds credibly in a well represented chronology. I was rather incredulous however when Deke Slayton (Kyle Chandler) let Armstrong (Ryan Gosling) know he was selected to command the Apollo xi mission in a bathroom.
Visually, the flight scenes and moon landing are noteworthy, and deserving of the Visual Effects Oscar the picture earned. On the flip side, that moon landing scene does exhibit the kind of realism that allows skeptics to say the whole matter was staged. I actually can't get over how dumbo some people can exist. Aforementioned thing with the Twin Towers conspiracy folks, but save that for another twenty-four hours. And then all in all, the film, based on a remarkably true story, deserves a worthwhile viewing, even if the omission of the American flag on the moon is not based on a true story.
3 out of vi found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
We're approaching the fiftieth anniversary
Warning: Spoilers
With the fiftieth anniversary of the moon landing approaching, I decided to watch Damien Chazelle's University Honor-nominated "Commencement Human". As with many movies about famous historical events, there's the focus on the ideation, planning, and completion of the event, also as the personal life of the main person. I didn't wait any sort of masterpiece, but I did similar the scene where the people protest to the tune of Gil Scott-Heron's "Whitey on the Moon" (about the lack of attention paid to people in the inner metropolis). I estimate the fact that the USSR sent the first satellite (Sputnik), kickoff man (Yuri Gagarin), get-go adult female (Valentina Tereshkova) and first dog (Laika) into infinite, just the US reached the moon get-go, it all balances out. I wonder if nosotros'll e'er have commercial space travel.
Anyway, worth seeing. Damien Chazelle previously bandage Ryan Gosling in "La La Country", which I have no plans to ever see.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
First Homo
Warning: Spoilers
From seeing the trailer for this film about two months earlier its release, I had good feelings about and was very excited to run across information technology, it is i of those real-life stories you always wanted to see re-enacted on the large screen, directed by Damien Chazelle (Whiplash, La La State). Basically in 1961, Neil Armstrong (Ryan Gosling) is a NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) test pilot who inadvertently bounces off the atmosphere flying the Ten-fifteen rocket plane. He does manage to land the plane in the Mojave Desert, just he is grounded subsequently his colleagues express business organization his recent tape of mishaps is due to lark. His ii-and-a-one-half-yr-sometime daughter Karen (Lucy Brooke Stafford) has a brain tumour and is undergoing treatment, Neil is desperate to relieve her and logs her symptoms and tries to find other treatments, but she dies from her illness. Neil is grief-stricken but applies for Project Gemini and is accepted to NASA Astronaut Grouping 2. Alongside other astronaut families, Armstrong, his married woman Janet (BAFTA and Aureate Earth nominated Claire Foy) and their son Rick (Gavin Warren and Luke Winters) move to Houston. Armstrong begins training and befriends beau test pilot Elliot Run across (Patrick Fugit) and test pilot and engineer Ed White (Jason Clarke). Deke Slayton (Kyle Chandler) describes to the new astronauts the importance of the Gemini program, equally the Soviet Spousal relationship accept achieved every milestone in the Space Race ahead of the United States. During the preparation, Neil and Janet take a second son, Mark Armstrong (Connor Colton Blodgett). The family has settled in Houston past 1965, and Armstrong is waiting to be selected for a crew. Later on the Soviets consummate the first extravehicular activity (EVA), Armstrong is informed that he will be commander of Gemini viii, with David Scott (Christopher Abbott) as airplane pilot. Prior to the mission, Run across and Charles Bassett are killed in a T-38 crash. Armstrong and Scott successfully launch on Gemini 8, and dock with the Agena target vehicle, simply soon afterward, the spacecraft begins spinning rapidly. Armstrong nearly blacks out only manages to actuate the RCS thrusters and safely aborts the mission. Armstrong faces initial criticism, but NASA determines the crew is not at fault, White later on reveals that Armstrong has been selected for the Apollo 1 mission along with Gus Grissom (Shea Whigham) and Roger Chaffee (Cory Michael Smith). On January 27, 1967, during a plugs-out test, a fire breaks out in the Apollo 1 and kills the coiffure, Neil hears the news whilst at the White Firm representing NASA. The following year, Armstrong is almost killed ejecting from the Lunar Landing Research Vehicle. He is selected to command Apollo eleven, and Slayton informs him that it will likely exist the first lunar landing. But prior to the launch, Janet confronts Neil about the possibility that he will non survive the flight and insists that he explain the risks of the mission to their children. Afterward telling them about the risks he faces during the mission, Neil says bye to his family and departs. Apollo eleven successfully launches, with Armstrong commanding, Michael "Mike" Collins (Lucas Haas) as command module pilot, and Fizz Aldrin (Corey Stoll) as lunar module pilot. At that place are no bug during the flight, the craft arrives at the Moon on the 4th day out. Armstrong and Aldrin undock in the Lunar Module and brainstorm the landing attempt, but Aldrin realises the landing site is full of large boulders, forcing Armstrong to take manual control to state. The lunar module successfully lands with minimal fuel remaining. Armstrong steps out onto the lunar surface and speaking to NASA declares the immortal words, "It's one small stride for human, one giant bound for flesh." With tears in his optics, he looks at the Moon surface, the galaxy of stars, and the beauty of the Globe, and property Karen's bracelet, he drops into Little Westward crater. With their mission complete, the astronauts return abode and are placed in quarantine, to begin months of tests for infections and other factors, at that place Armstrong and Janet share a quiet moment of reflection. Also starring Ciarán Hinds as Bob Gilruth, Olivia Hamilton as Pat White, Pablo Schreiber equally Jim Lovell, Ethan Embry every bit Pete Conrad, Brian d'Arcy James equally Joe Walker, Kris Swanberg as Marilyn See, J.D. Evermore as Chris Kraft and Leon Bridges as Gil Scott-Heron. Gosling is a expert lookalike of the real Armstrong and gives a terrific performance as the family unit man and the astronaut going on the historical space journeying, Foy is also fantastic as his concerned just loyal wife, many of the supporting bandage playing recognisable real-name characters are great every bit well. It is the simple story of how Armstrong started out every bit a tester pilot and went on to become the first homo to walk on the Moon, information technology works well as both an insight into the dangerous but history-making mission, and also an insight into how those close to Armstrong are affected by what must be washed, the Moon landing itself, from the moment the door opens to silence and on the lunar surface, is a beautiful scene, with fantastic music, including the use of the Theremin, by Justin Hurwitz, Chazelle has created an unforgettable cinematic splendour, a must see biographical drama. It won the Oscar for Best Visual Effects, and information technology was nominated for Best Audio Editing, Best Production Blueprint and Best Audio Mixing, it was nominated the BAFTA for Best Adapted Screenplay, All-time Editing, Best Cinematography, All-time Special Visual Effects, Best Audio and All-time Production Design, and it won the Aureate Earth for All-time Original Score for Justin Hurwitz. Very skilful!
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Biopic about the man, Armstrong, who became the first to walk on the Moon.
My wife and I watched this at home on BluRay from our public library. Of course the picture and sound are first-rate, only it as well included a number of interesting "extras" on the making of, including how they recreated a realistic Moonscape instead of using CG.
I remember all this well, I was a higher student in the 1960s when JFK announced at Rice Academy that we were going to put a man on the Moon before the stop of the 1960s, and nosotros did in 1969. That man was Neil Armstrong, played here by Ryan Gosling.
So this motion picture, "First Man", is primarily about the man, Armstrong, what in his life influenced him and what drove him to succeed. It doesn't embrace whatever of his growing up in Ohio, or his Aeronautical Engineering education at Purdue Academy, or his stint in the Navy. Instead information technology starts in 1961 when he was a test pilot then was called for astronaut training, and ends with his return to Earth after the first Moon landing.
Armstrong was a special kind of astronaut, near focused when things became tense, without him at the controls the safe Moon may not take e'er happened that day in 1969.
Good movie!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
conventional in some means, but its deep well of feeling and experimentation resonates
Who knew what the astronaut dramatization needed was the aesthetic from Saving Private Ryan? (Or Man of Steel came to listen besides, and here information technology is far more effective viscerally and emotionally, and apt every bit it is, you know, existent people who have lived and suffered and triumphed)
Every time Damien Chazelle and visitor have ane of the space sequences, from the opening to the Gemini 8 sequence, to the horror of the Apollo 1 test, it occurred to me that this is less the Right Stuff and more a hardcore war movie: these men are as much soldiers every bit they are scientists, and so the experience of the thing makes sense. If you're facing death and have an acceptance of it (not to mention in Neil/Jane's case, after the worst has already happened), that should ask of the storyteller something more than than locked-down cameras. This is to outer space what Black Swan is to dance - there's largely horror to what happens and, if we're lucky, some awe, though not so much.
This resonates and the filmmakers use a mix of 16mm and 35mm photography to attain the kind of intimacy that could abound old fast, and nosotros've seen this style before, but, what can I say except I responded to Chazelle and Lundgren'due south closeups, the mode they would proceed some shots steadier than others to keep the pace off our guard, Gosling channels convincingly how men of applied science (and men oftentimes were in general) from that generation, and it'south Claire Foy's time to win like 700 awards for this performance.
This is the kind of Oscar bait Im happy to watch, and I'm anticipating this volition get all-time film for reason to do and not exercise with the film in and of itself (in a sense this would win considering Right Stuff, which is greater and more artistically ambitious, lost). And, man, seeing this in IMAX really does make a difference and feels a part of the whole thing (and unlike Nolan and Dunkirk, it doesn't change at random moments, it'south IMAX on the moon and that's it). Information technology's a gripping tension between conventional (the script) and experimental/loose (Chazelle).
...I might've liked Buzz Aldrin to come off every bit more than just an a-hole though (and Lukas Haas gets the curt shrift equally Mike Collins, who is barely even named that out loud). 8.five/10
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Enjoyable
This motion picture tells the story of the years leading to the start man walking on the moon.
The story focuses on the human attribute of the journey, which makes it more than engaging than a focus on the technical aspect of the hugely circuitous mission. The alien feelings Neil Armstrong has days before the mission is really well depicted. I enjoyed watching it.
i out of four found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Quiet and unassuming pic of a hero
Warning: Spoilers
This a good glimpse at the life of Neil Armstrong (Ryan Gosling) according to the book by James R. Hansen. FIRST Human is almost an insider's expect at NASA'S mission to country a man on the moon. Nil over-glorifying in the telling of the sacrifices and costs on Armstrong through his triumphs and failures leading to that legendary infinite mission in 1969, that had him condign the offset man to walk on the moon. Test pilot to hero known all over the earth.
Not really fair to lump this flick with the other bigger proper noun space movies. Some existent good scenes that will rock and milkshake you and give y'all some shivers. Some characters may cause some moodiness. The multi-talented bandage also features: Claire Foy, Jason Clarke, Christopher Abbott, Kyle Chandler, William Gregory Lee, Ethan Embry, Skyler Bible, Olivia Hamilton and Corey Stoll.
2 out of four found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Enthralling telling of a momentous event in human history
The life of Neil Armstrong. Starts in 1961, with Armstrong as a test pilot and ends, shows the Gemini and Apollo projects and culminates in Armstrong'due south virtually famous event: being the showtime human on the moon.
Directed by Damien Chazelle (La La Land, Whiplash), a great, riveting telling of the human being backside and the events leading upward to one of the momentous events in human history. Shows incredibly well the development of the NASA space program, the dangers involved, the sacrifices made, the narrow margin for error and the courage and determination involved.
The space flying scenes are incredibly realistic, ofttimes putting you in Armstrong'due south shoes. Even though yous know how it is going to stop, you're still on the edge of your seat throughout these scenes. Very nerve-wracking, gritty and engaging.
Unfortunately, Chazelle can't replicate this date in the Globe-leap scenes, peculiarly the scenes showing Armstrong'south dwelling life. The domestic stuff is pretty boring. Some of this is deliberate. Chazelle wants to show Armstrong as cold and calculating and show how this is a positive and negative: what makes him a not bad astronaut makes him less perfect as a married man and male parent. It's also a counter-signal to the sheer adrenaline rush that is his job.
However, the domestic stuff never leads to whatever nifty profundity and ultimately is largely filler. Chazelle could have cutting almost, if not all, of it out of the moving-picture show and we would have had a perfect film.
5 out of vi found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This is by far the scariest movie . . .
Alarm: Spoilers
. . . that Universal'south "House of Horror" has ever made (and I've seen nigh of them, from the silent HUNCHBACK OF NOTRE DAME and PHANTOM OF THE OPERA right through weeks of DRACVLA, FRANKENSTEIN, MUMMY, WOLF Human, INVISIBLE Human, and CREATURE FROM THE Black LAGOON flicks). Every moment of First Homo is fraught with Terror, from the opening scene of "Neil'southward" 10-xv bouncing into Outer Space to the endmost pathos of he and his wife unable to articulate a thought in the vast emptiness of their moon-visitor Quarantine Room. ("Ripley" enjoys a picnic during ALIEN compared to Mrs. Armstrong's suffering throughout FIRST MOON.) The ominous hollow clanking and grinding noises of U.S. rocket ships both Earlier and afterwards launch sound like the TITANIC breaking in half, and the fact that something always goes incorrect--frequently with deadly results--every time an American astronaut goes to work no doubt prompted Real Life SIRENS OF TITAN writer Kurt Vonnegut to demand that the U.S. Space Plan finish and desist (in a prune from a Tv set interview) included during FIRST MAN. As Colonel Kurtz would say, "The Horror! The Horror!!"
2 out of six found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Permit's play Twister, let'south play Adventure (yes, yeah, yeah, yeah)
Warning: Spoilers
First Man is a straightforwardly tiresome biographical film, that I couldn't relate to.
Forth with being a genius, comes lack of personality and lack of sense of humor information technology seems. Like Jerry said on "Seinfeld" He's got super strength, super speed.. I'm sure he's got super humour. Why? Why would that one area of his mind not be afflicted by the yellow lord's day of World? Ryan Gosling says the lines straight faced and never changes expression the unabridged film, not interim one time.
Now every wife of a bully man has to exist a great woman, with presence, pa-lease. It's odd that no one has mentioned the scene of Janet walking into NASA. With the rest of the film existence and then straightforwardly ho-hum and told with documentary manner accuracy, this doesn't stand up out as fabricated? I mean, in another motion picture information technology wouldn't be out of place. In real life though, they wouldn't be told of her arrival. The mission's in jeopardy and lives are in peril, they're non going to cease doing their jobs to be chewed out by her. She would only sit there and expect. This is what the writers deemed worthy of really making a film.
The personalities and lifestyle are paper-thin cutouts, except Fizz and none of them I could connect or chronicle to. Why this Kyle Chandler gets these roles I'll never know, Whigham was available.
2 out of five found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Who Knew Space Was Such a Slog?
Seriously, is the space plan really this dreary?
Ok, then Damien Chazelle, the wunderkind manager who wowed everyone with "Whiplash" and "La La State," didn't want to make an astronaut movie in the traditional Hollywood mode of films such every bit, say, "The Correct Stuff." Fair enough. Neil Armstrong was a bit of a reluctant hero, shy of fame and press and motivated more than past internal reasons (co-ordinate to this moving-picture show, at least) than past the glamour of the infinite programme. Indeed, this movie seems to be maxim that the glamour highlighted in other movies is largely a fiction, and that the existent story is i of hard and thankless piece of work, drudgery, stress, anxiety, loneliness, you name it. I believe that that's truthful. Only is any of that reason to inflict such a gloomy slog of a moving-picture show on the states? Was Neil Armstrong really the bare-faced automaton as portrayed by Ryan Gosling? Do we have to bleed every ounce of excitement and wonder out of the story only to make it more accurate? Considering even if it'south not equally exciting or dramatic as "The Right Stuff" makes it expect, yet, infinite travel is pretty cool, and we should be allowed our sense of awe at seeing a man walk on the moon for the get-go time.
And Chazelle'southward directorial choices are irritatingly claustrophobic throughout this picture. I get that he wants us to perceive events from the perspective of the astronauts, which accounts for the tight and shaky frames and limited viewpoints, but he sticks so rigidly to his artful that he makes it literally difficult to see what's going on, which simply becomes aggravating afterwards a while.
The movie does take one thing going for it, which is Justin Hurwitz'south wonderful score. Information technology'south the only thing well-nigh the film that comes close to being rousing, and it deserves a better movie.
No wonder this one bombed.
Grade: D
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A long, dull film near an unlikeable man and his unlikeable wife, filmed unwatchably with mitt-held photographic camera
Warning: Spoilers
Neil Armstrong joins the infinite program in the 1960s and ends upwards commanding the first mission to state on the moon. Along the way, some family stuff happens.
This is a very long film almost the part of Neil Armstrong's life leading up to the moon landing. It is directed by Damien Chazelle who deservedly won Best Director Oscar for La-La Land. His direction here seems to be based along the idea of filming virtually everything in close-up with a mitt-held photographic camera. Equally a upshot, this is a physically hard picture to watch: it is a 18-carat relief when the camera rests on a tripod.
What else can I tell you about information technology? Ryan Gosling is asked to play Armstrong as utterly emotionless. Since this is something Gosling does in so many of his films, he does it very well. But it doesn't brand you care near Armstrong. Nor practice you care nigh his wife. In fact, they are both people you are quite glad that they don't alive adjacent door to you, a miserable, joyless pair.
The moving picture is also irksome and tiresome. How on earth did they manage that, given the story thing? But they did.
The actual moon landing is done well. That'southward near v minutes at the cease of 2 and a quarter hours.
This should have been MUCH meliorate than it is.
eight out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
quietly heroic
Greetings again from the darkness. "That'due south one small step for (a) human, one behemothic leap for mankind." Every junior loftier student learns that Neil Armstrong spoke those words when he became the first person to walk on the moon'due south surface in 1969. And so while his words are etched into our minds and the televised visuals of the historic upshot are seared into our corneas, most of us know little of the man who is renowned as an American hero. Manager Damien Chazelle (LA LA LAND, WHIPLASH) finds a way to personalize a man's story without sacrificing the corresponding grandiose theatre and immense danger.
Kicking off with one of the virtually intense cinematic sequences e'er, the moving-picture show puts u.s.a. inside the LLRV (Lunar Landing Inquiry Vehicle) with Armstrong in 1961 as he bounces off the atmosphere and rockets towards almost certain death. This opening makes the statement that this is no ordinary homo, and this is no ordinary movie ... and we are at present prepared to agree on tight! Based on James R Hansen'due south book, the simply biography Armstrong authorized, the script from Oscar winner Josh Singer (SPOTLIGHT) expertly balances the exam pilot/astronaut portion with the character study/personality of the man.
Intensity is on brandish throughout - whether in a sheathing or during family unit time. Ryan Gosling stars as Neil Armstrong, and the story tracks him from 1961 through that famous moment in 1969. What we see is a man who was offset an engineer, and then a pilot. A man whose intellect and nerve allowed him to exist office of the 2d group of pilots selected for NASA'south astronaut programme in 1962. The outset group was the Mercury Vii. He was as well a human being emotionally devastated by the expiry of his young girl Karen (from a encephalon tumor) and the numerous deaths of friends and associates in the space plan. The film clearly shows how he was impacted.
Proving truthful JFK's declaration that the driving force wasn't that information technology was easy, simply rather that it was quite hard (and dangerous), we glimpse some of the inner workings of NASA, and what becomes clear that the space program was high stakes gambling filled with huge risks - all for a space race against the Russians that was motivated by ego and national pride. Daily danger was part of the job, as was the claustrophobia that comes with sitting in tin can can space capsules being monitored past computers far less powerful than the cell phone you are likely using to read this. Armstrong'due south claustrophobia somehow seemed less apparent during his flights than during press conferences or sitting at the kitchen tabular array with his family - providing even more insight into the man.
Claire Foy ("The Crown") plays Janet Armstrong, the potent-for-the-kids while suffering-in- (mostly) silence homemaker wife. Ms. Foy does a overnice job of carrying the emotional turmoil that goes with beingness an astronaut's wife, and having no ane to share the uncertainty and worry with. Jason Clarke plays Ed White, the kickoff American to walk in space (Gemini four) and Armstrong'southward neighbour and shut friend. Olivia Hamilton plays his married woman Janet, while Kyle Chandler plays Deke Slayton, and Corey Stoll offers upwards a not and then complimentary portrayal of Buzz Aldrin. Other familiar faces in the cast include Shea Whigham as Gus Grissom, Christopher Abbott as Dave Scott, Pablo Schreiber every bit Jim Lovell (played past Tom Hanks in APOLLO thirteen), Ethan Embry, Ciaran Hinds, Patrick Fugit, Lukas Haas, Cory Michael Smith, Brian D'Arcy James, and Leon Bridges.
Meticulous attention to details of the era include kids that actually ask to go play outdoors (and aren't overly impressed with astronaut dads). The sound pattern and set designs are phenomenal and complement the outstanding cinematography of Linus Sandgren (Oscar winner for LA LA LAND). The abundance of close-ups permit for an intimacy that makes the monumental space sequences even more breath-taking. Actual historic infinite sound is used whenever possible, and managing director Chazelle doesn't shy away from showing u.s. the "other side" of the space plan: Gil Scott-Heron's "Whitey'south on the Moon", author Kurt Vonnegut publically questioning the program, and many citizens wondering why so much money is being spent on rockets while there were so many other areas (including Vietnam) in need of attention.
The sense of humour is frequently quite sly, including a scene where his competitive applicants shrug off Armstrong equally merely a "Civilian", unaware of his remarkable service and tape in the Korean War as a Navy Fighter Pilot. Gosling'south quietly intense portrayal of Armstrong could be termed constrained, just information technology's quite plumbing equipment given his subject. Composer Justin Hurwitz (Oscar winner for LA LA State) delivers and unusual merely fitting score, and we can't assistance but realize this would brand a terrific trilogy bookended by THE Right STUFF (1983) and APOLLO 13 (1995). Chazelle presents a fitting bio of a true American hero (and yes, we can see the flag on the moon), while besides giving the states a await at the harrowing process of putting folks into infinite. Information technology's on us to decide if information technology's worth it, only leaves no doubt that President Kennedy was right ... it is hard.
5 out of 10 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Could have been better
This well meaning but flawed movie is still interesting. The screenplay is hard to follow at times. This movie is for people who know a bit about the characters and events already. If y'all want a clear and thorough depiction of the moon landing watch the series From the World to the Moon. The camera piece of work is shaky when it doesn't need to be.
This movie doesn't glamourize things. It shows the physical trauma during training and landing.
Ryan plays it potent and silent. A chip too expressionless. Claire Foy looks worried every bit his wife though she is written very believing for that fourth dimension. Also her hair style is then severe. Jason Clark as Ed White who was killed is miscast. Looks too evil.
The landing is well recreated and the all-time part of the movie.
2 out of half dozen found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
'It'll exist an run a risk'
One of the almost memorable quotes in the past hundred years is the familiar 'That's ane small step for man, i behemothic leap for mankind' - the words we all heard when Neil Armstrong set human foot on the moon on July 20, 1969. James' R. Hansen's book has been adapted for the screen past Josh Vocalist and the picture is directed by Damien Chazelle (La La Land, Whiplash).
The moving picture covers the years 1961 - 1969 in the life of Neil Armstrong (Ryan Gosling), beginning with Armstrong's trials every bit a pilot and proceeds through his training for the Gemini mission and the famous moon landing. Forth the way the psyche of the astronaut is explored past revealing his interactions with his wife Janet (Claire Foy) and terminally ill daughter Karen (Lucy Stafford), his friend and fellow astronaut Ed White (Jason Clarke) and his wife Pat (Olivia Hamilton) whose lives modify Neil's perception of his mission. Nods are given to Buzz Aldrin (Corey Stoll), Elliot See (Patrick Fugit) and other very small-scale cameos.
Much of the flick is very loud, with all the harrowing tension that accompanies the launching and flying of spacecraft extended to nigh the breaking signal. The facts are there but what is missing is a storyline that allows the audience to back-trail Armstrong'due south historic mission. It is a noisy take chances with rather apartment performances past the primary characters, but it does encourage retrieve of that momentous mean solar day in 1969 with reality.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This is ground control to Major Tom.
July 20, 1969, the day the first man walked on the moon. It'south a historical appointment and it's virtually time they make a decent movie well-nigh this memorable solar day. To me Outset Homo was entertaining from the starting time till the stop. No fancy sci-fi gadgets, only more raw images where you get the sensation that alot could go wrong. Neil Armstrong, played beautifully by Ryan Gosling, was a devoted man to his career, perhaps not as much to his family, but and so again the life of an astronaut tin can't exist that simple as for example the life of a postman. I idea it was a pretty skilful resumé of the solar day-to-twenty-four hours life of Neil Armstrong, with non merely his outset steps on the moon but also of previous incidents in the heaven. Those events were nicely shot as they gave the audience that feeling that annihilation could go incorrect anytime now. It's a long pic, just it's never slow, and I think they could have made it even longer equally this was one event nobody will e'er forget about.
1 out of iv found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
under rated!
mm-39 27 Dec 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Kickoff Human being is under rated! Not a corking movie like the Correct Stuff. Keen either. Maybe in that location was a need for more razzle dazzle like the Right Stuff, simply Showtime Homo was more personal. What works was the character mechanics of Armstrong who was absurd, cold, engineer who understood flight, mechanics every bit a test pilot. Start Human being is about the human, and the children, and the cold life of the astronaut; The best part is when all goes wrong with the capsule only the picture show is besides cold similar the lunar surface. Many dice just Armstrong says cold. The ending was cold which was maybe the intention, but a cool caput was needed to notice the right landing site. Start Man is under rated worth watching. six stars but chilly!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1213641/reviews
0 Response to "Where Can I See First Man Near Me"
Publicar un comentario